Angela Elson
  • Blog
  • Clips
  • Grammar Tips
  • Contact

ACTIVE VS. PASSIVE VOICE

10/20/2016

0 Comments

 
In passive voice: This week’s grammar tip is brought to you by a query from the peanut gallery!
In active voice: A query from the peanut gallery brought you this week’s grammar tip!

  • What is the difference between active voice and passive voice?
    • In a sentence written in active voice, the subject does an action to an object.
      • Example: I ate ten pizzas.
    • In a sentence written in passive voice, this subject-action-object sequence is backward, making the object acted upon by the subject
      • Example: Ten pizzas were eaten by me.
  • Which is preferred?
    • Active voice is usually preferred since passive is thought by some to be wordy, vague and generally inefficient.
      • Passive: Ten pairs of shoes were bought. (By whom?)
      • Active: Bob bought ten pairs of shoes. (That clears up most everything.)
  • So is passive voice wrong?
    • Not entirely. Because it accentuates a different part of the sentence, passive voice is useful in certain situations:
      • To avoid owning up to something.
        • Passive: You are being dumped. (The lack of I in this sentence allows the speaker to shirk responsibility.)
        • Active: I am dumping you. (No getting around that.)
      • If the person doing the action isn’t known or isn’t important.
        • Passive: My car was stolen. (This focuses on the car.)
        • Active: Somebody stole my car. (Of course someone stole it… but that’s not exactly the most important part.
    • Passive voice can also be used to mix up sentence structure or focus on the more important aspect by putting it first.
      • All active: This house has a blue door, and a lock keeps it secure.
      • Some passive: This house has a blue door and is kept secure by a lock.
        • The idea of security might be more important than the lock itself, so you could use passive voice to accentuate that rather than the other way around.
  • In summary:
    • Passive voice can be used—but only sparingly and strategically.
0 Comments

That vs. which

10/20/2016

0 Comments

 
My husband, Brady, took me fishing this weekend, which is an activity I find very boring. So I pondered grammar to pass the time—that is until Brady caught a fish that died as he was trying to release it back into the lake. As that poor, doomed bass floated by, my thoughts turned to the beauty of life, the cruel inevitability of death, and then, naturally, to the difference between that and which.
 
Wait… there’s a difference?
  • Yes! “That” and “which” cannot be used interchangeably, for “that” denotes a restrictive clause and “which” denotes a nonrestrictive clause.

Say whaaaaaat?
  • A restrictive clause is a part of the sentence you cannot get rid of without changing the meaning
    • The fish that died haunted me all night.
      • Removing “that died” changes the meaning of the sentence, as “The [presumably alive] fish haunted me all night” doesn’t make as much sense.
  • A nonrestrictive clause is extra fat: getting rid of it will not change the meaning.
    • The fish died, which haunted me all night.
      • You can remove “which haunted me all night,” and the meat of the sentence is not really affected.

So you could say “that” helps define a sentence, while “which” offers extra information or helps clarify the meaning of the sentence as a whole?
  • Exactly.
    • Fishing is a sport that Brady loves.
      • In this sentence, “that Brady loves” reflects on sport and helps define it in terms of his preferences.
    • Fishing is a sport, which Brady loves.
      • This sentence is looser, as it implies that Brady loves the fact that fishing is a sport rather than the sport of fishing itself.

What happens if I mix them up?
  • Catastrophes upon catastrophes! Consider the following example:
    • My husband killed the fish that was sad.
      • This implies that the fish was sad before he died, and since I was there I can tell you the fish was quite content before his demise. Therefore, this sentence is not true.
    • My husband killed the fish, which was sad.
      • This implies that the act, as a whole, was sad. And it was.

How do I punctuate “that” and “which”?
  • “That” requires no additional punctuation. (Think: “That was easy.”)
  • A “which” clause, which is a little harder to remember, is set off by commas.

I hope this clears up some grammatical issues that have been haunting you.
0 Comments

    let me correct your grammar

    As a former ESL teacher and professional proofreader, I'm more than happy to tell you where to put the comma.
    Hit me up with your conundrums!

    Archives

    September 2017
    May 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    February 2015
    January 2015

    CategorY

    All

    RSS Feed

  • Blog
  • Clips
  • Grammar Tips
  • Contact